... | Darflen

is what's going to happen

i think we should reform ownership of anarchy communities

if someone joins a memeberless community, they are supposed to gain owner rights and not the original creator:
1. paradock nor anyone who (theoretically) has darflen admin rights can see the original creator of an anarchy group and finding the original owner of a group is pure speculation or allegations
2. ofc subjective, but morally owners of such groups do not even deserve the ownership of their anarachies, they themselves created it with the sole intention of it being ownerless, therefore not being it's owner in the first place
3. anarchies are literally an exploit and someone joining it is just fixing a community

Comments

unarchist main 6 months ago
yeah no since paradock didnt even read my message
... 6 months ago
since you blocked me on your main but not on your alt maybe check this out

(no this isn't block evasion since it's you with the alt and you interacted first)
... 6 months ago
1. There is a list of creators of communities
2. Your solution doesn't actually respect the needs of anarchy community supporters, it's just a way for you to get more communities. A solution should make everyone happy.
3. Does that mean should be deleted, that people following themselves should have their followers removed? Clearly not, that's history.
- unarchist main 6 months ago
  1. paradock himself said he cannot view the creators, and even such lists can be not truthful if they didnt come from actual API results or paradock, if you dont just mean anarshitties in general;
  2. ffs, anarchies are not respectful of anything, they're a waste of community space and is literally just namesniping with even less gain to the owner - anarchies are making no one happy except their creators;
  3. yeah, did you know that 1833 abaraham lincoln create the slavery abolition act which cancelled slavery in america - obviously, he was ruining history! WHO THE FUCK thought "that's history you have no right to remove it" is a good excuse? i dont even insist on deliting anyone, but disallowing people from joining anarchies and giving anarshitties ownership back which they themself are removing in the first place.
- ... 6 months ago
  1. the lists are truthful because we have the written proof of the creators
  2. "anarchies are not respectful" and you think calling them "anarshitties" is?? and if you're saying they're a waste of space well many communities are! and not all of them anarchy communities! and some anarchy communities aren't namesnipes! and you're a hypocrite!
  3. it wasn't ruining history it was changing the future - ruining history would've been deleting the records that slavery ever happened, your example is comparable to removing the ability to create the communities. also i think comparing this to slavery is overreacting.
  4. "i don't even insist on deleting anymore" fun fact doing "if someone joins a memeberless community, they are supposed to gain owner rights and not the original creator" essentially deletes the community's ownerlessness