endorsed by pardoc ✅✅✅
proposed solution for fixing the anarchy community drama, need opinions:
Anarchy communities will be listed and their owners found (this is already partially done), and one of the three will take place:
1. Those that are decided by the former owners to be kept ownerless will have their visibility changed to invite only, and current members banned.
2. Communities which are chosen by the creators not to ban members will allow joining, so anarchy communities can still be used for things if the creator wants to.
3. If the creator wants to, ownership can be given to one of the members.
suggest improvements in the comments
proposed solution for fixing the anarchy community drama, need opinions:
Anarchy communities will be listed and their owners found (this is already partially done), and one of the three will take place:
1. Those that are decided by the former owners to be kept ownerless will have their visibility changed to invite only, and current members banned.
2. Communities which are chosen by the creators not to ban members will allow joining, so anarchy communities can still be used for things if the creator wants to.
3. If the creator wants to, ownership can be given to one of the members.
suggest improvements in the comments
Comments
-
4. creator can ban members who will not leave and kick members who they trust to leave and still being public
Paradock agreed to this several times recently, he banned darkpet and pre-banned @kye from which I owned as well as, %(4 underscores), and probably another one I forgot the name of. The reason for this is because I am opposed to making the communities invite-only because invite only means no posting and I sometimes like to post in my anarchy communities. Joinable 0-member anarchy communities aren't as rare as they were before because there have been more exploits discovered recently despite darkpet and Barney spam-joining anarchy communities (or just communities in general for darkpet) and people like who joined anarchy communities after they were asked to join by unarchists (Barney and his alts). Nobody else seems to be interested in doing this, except for jinx (who left so, he won't cause any problems for now) and (inactive), which means 0-member communities are mostly safe to be joinble unless the spam-joiners aren't banned.
tldr
Joinable 0-member communities are an important and cool part of darflen and are safe from joining if Barney and darkpet are banned and their creators should be able to set the visibility to what they want. -
-
please make the owners have full control of the communities like if they currently owned them
-
I don't have many problems with this apart the pre-banning. a ban is when you break the rules; if the rules say no joining then joiners can be banned. but it's a bit strange to ban people for something they haven't done yet. if i banned you for, idk, a drama that'll happen in 2026 would you be opposed to that?
also can't you just post in the same anarchy communities which already have removed members
1. Yes, but @kye spam-joined anarchy communities only so he could piss people off, which is why he was pre-banned (to prevent him from joining it).
2. why
1. doesn't answer my point
2. you already have anarchy communities you can post from
2. which ones
2. the ones you already used I guess?
2. ok