anyway I only remember making 2 anarchy communities so here's what I want to happen to them (if it's decided I have a say in the matter):
%sneaky
no owner, public/unlisted, allow joining
i don't really care about its memberlessness, only its ownerlessness
if banning specific users is an option, then just ban specifically because why not
%hmm
two options
- delete entirely (cons: loss of context)
- private, ban everyone (cons: if an exploit happens it might just go back to being what it is now)
it really has no reason to exist, other than maybe housing the three posts that it has
leaning towards second to keep some shred of context for those posts
%wsh
still unsure if I actually created this one, but if I did I would like this one to be deleted
no posts that will lose any context, so this is an easy decision
%sneaky
no owner, public/unlisted, allow joining
i don't really care about its memberlessness, only its ownerlessness
if banning specific users is an option, then just ban specifically because why not
%hmm
two options
- delete entirely (cons: loss of context)
- private, ban everyone (cons: if an exploit happens it might just go back to being what it is now)
it really has no reason to exist, other than maybe housing the three posts that it has
leaning towards second to keep some shred of context for those posts
%wsh
still unsure if I actually created this one, but if I did I would like this one to be deleted
no posts that will lose any context, so this is an easy decision
Comments
-
"cons: if an exploit happens it might just go back to being what it is now" I really don't think that's going to happen anytime soon, darflen security has been upgraded -
actually was ever an anarchy community because I thought it was until today
if it was I'd still like to keep ownership for now
5 months ago; it was probably with the original exploit
this actually makes me wonder whether it was kicking or just demoting myself to member (I don't actually remember now)