finally we have moderators other than paradock
I have no doubt that moderation will improve and reports will be actually read if your username isn't
let's hope paradock calms down on moderating according to off platform behavior
I have no doubt that moderation will improve and reports will be actually read if your username isn't
let's hope paradock calms down on moderating according to off platform behavior
Comments
-
just looking to repeat souple's question but I'd like to hear an answer from you and not the guy who absolutely needs that change -
why should paradock "calms down on moderating according to off platform behavior"? -
Basically meaning, if it's not on Darflen, it doesn't matter.
Eg; I say inhumaine things to Jinx on discord, I wouldn't get banned unless it got dragged to Darflen.
And why? It just makes sense. Why ban somebody unless they're causing an issue on the real platform. -
that rule was mostly added to give reason to ban users who boast about account hacking on darflen, as it isn't technically against the rules to say that you got a -7 million year old Scratch account by hacking it. the TOS makes it possible to deal with those kinds of people, but considering events breaking this prior to the change aren't worth moderating, it wasn't even enough to ban qxva, who hacked way too many users.
the biggest issue that I know of, which I didn't tell anyone because I wanted to have time to think of an improvement, is that there is sometimes lack of verifiability. no admin permissions on wo.m? can't check if qxva hacked it! etc. although he does make it really obvious, some issues arise, leaving loopholes where users can be banned without good reason. that hasn't happened yet though, but it needs addressing. -
because off site behaviour such as your drama on discord almost shattered the darflen community. it does have an effect.
"Threatens the safety or well-being of others."
could well be interpreted as something like insulting someone even if it's playful
or something more intense like doxxing and that would actually threaten their safety
and as for that example, yeah just give pardoc the way you'd word it and he'll probably change it