I think anarchy community owners should be able to do what they want with their communities
Paradock said "The worst thing is that it is an anarchy community" in has reply to one of my comments in a thread about. The question was "A user who was banned from the community (@kye) told these users to join just to annoy people, which is why he was banned from the community. Does this count as community ban bypassing in a way?" If something is a bug/exploit and isn't supposed to happen, it doesn't mean it's a bad thing, like the Darflen ban bypassing vulnerability would've been a bad thing if someone like ayd (who was banned a few days after ban bypassing was patched) had discovered it, but anarchy communities don't cause harm and are a cool piece of art. Some anarchy communities were given away without permission from the creator (%qwertyqwerty). I think the owners of the communties should be able to ask Paradock to ban members, change the visibility, edit the community display name, pfp and banner since they had ownership of the community previously. I also think that Anarchy owners should be able to remove anarchies they don't want on the wiki to avoid them being joined by unarchists like @oo and @kye/@
Paradock said "The worst thing is that it is an anarchy community" in has reply to one of my comments in a thread about. The question was "A user who was banned from the community (@kye) told these users to join just to annoy people, which is why he was banned from the community. Does this count as community ban bypassing in a way?" If something is a bug/exploit and isn't supposed to happen, it doesn't mean it's a bad thing, like the Darflen ban bypassing vulnerability would've been a bad thing if someone like ayd (who was banned a few days after ban bypassing was patched) had discovered it, but anarchy communities don't cause harm and are a cool piece of art. Some anarchy communities were given away without permission from the creator (%qwertyqwerty). I think the owners of the communties should be able to ask Paradock to ban members, change the visibility, edit the community display name, pfp and banner since they had ownership of the community previously. I also think that Anarchy owners should be able to remove anarchies they don't want on the wiki to avoid them being joined by unarchists like @oo and @kye/@
Comments
-
if you don't want people joining your anarchy community
1. make it invite only
alternatively
2. don't make it anarchy
2. What's the point of that if there aren't any anarchy communities?